supplements Ranked #6 of 8 in supplements
ShelfIQ AI Visibility Audit

Habit's AI Visibility Score: 27/100

Audited 21 May 2026 habit.com
27
ShelfIQ Score
Significant AI visibility gaps
Tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Claude · supplements category
Share Post on X LinkedIn

01 Where Habit appears (and disappears) in AI search

Live buyer prompts tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. These are the queries your customers use before deciding where to buy.

"best protein powder for muscle gain"
✗ Not cited
"natural supplements for energy"
✗ Not cited
"collagen supplement recommendations"
✗ Not cited

02 Top gaps costing Habit AI visibility

1
Missing ingredient-specific FAQ schema
Competitors with FAQ schema on product pages get cited 3–5× more in AI responses about specific ingredients.
2
No comparison content vs. category leaders
Buyers asking "X vs Y" get directed to review sites — not your store. A first-party comparison page fixes this.
3
Thin "benefits" content for AI extraction
AI models struggle to cite pages without structured benefit claims backed by schema markup.
🔒
Claim this audit to unlock all gaps + action plan
Claim the full audit →

03 Habit vs Category Leader

Habit · This brand
Habit
27
Rank #6 in supplements
Category leader · supplements
Huel
75
Rank #1 in supplements
Huel is scoring 48 points higher than Habit. The full audit shows exactly which AI queries Huel is winning that Habit isn't.
Is this your brand?

Claim the full Habit audit →

Enter your email below and we'll send the complete breakdown — every AI query, every gap, and a prioritised action plan. Free.

Free · No agency pitch · Results in under 60 seconds

Beat Habit's score — audit your own brand →

Not Habit? Run a free AI visibility audit on your supplements store and see how you compare.

Audit my brand free
Compare Habit against
Foodspring UK vs Habit Bird vs Habit Cult Nutrition vs Habit Habit vs Heights Habit vs Nature's Blast
Habit scores 27/100. Is this your brand? Claim the full report free. Claim this audit →