food Ranked #6 of 8 in food
ShelfIQ AI Visibility Audit

Kind's AI Visibility Score: 37/100

Audited 21 May 2026 kindsnacks.co.uk
37
ShelfIQ Score
Losing ground to competitors
Tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Claude · food category
Share Post on X LinkedIn

01 Where Kind appears (and disappears) in AI search

Live buyer prompts tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. These are the queries your customers use before deciding where to buy.

"healthy snacks delivered UK"
✗ Not cited
"organic food subscription boxes"
✗ Not cited
"best meal kit services UK"
✗ Not cited

02 Top gaps costing Kind AI visibility

1
Missing category-specific FAQ schema
Buyers searching for specific product attributes get directed to competitors with structured content.
2
No comparison or buying guide content
High-intent comparison queries route buyers to review sites instead of your brand page.
3
Sparse AggregateRating markup
Customer reviews exist but aren't schema-marked — AI platforms can't extract or cite them.
🔒
Claim this audit to unlock all gaps + action plan
Claim the full audit →

03 Kind vs Category Leader

Kind · This brand
Kind
37
Rank #6 in food
Category leader · food
Granola
67
Rank #1 in food
Granola is scoring 30 points higher than Kind. The full audit shows exactly which AI queries Granola is winning that Kind isn't.
Is this your brand?

Claim the full Kind audit →

Enter your email below and we'll send the complete breakdown — every AI query, every gap, and a prioritised action plan. Free.

Free · No agency pitch · Results in under 60 seconds

Beat Kind's score — audit your own brand →

Not Kind? Run a free AI visibility audit on your food store and see how you compare.

Audit my brand free
Compare Kind against
Kind vs ZenBisco Kind vs Roots Habitual vs Kind Kind vs Nuggets Kind vs Notpla
Kind scores 37/100. Is this your brand? Claim the full report free. Claim this audit →