apparel Ranked #2 of 7 in apparel
ShelfIQ AI Visibility Audit

OPA's AI Visibility Score: 60/100

Audited 21 May 2026 opa.co.uk
60
ShelfIQ Score
Visible but missing key queries
Tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Claude · apparel category
Share Post on X LinkedIn

01 Where OPA appears (and disappears) in AI search

Live buyer prompts tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. These are the queries your customers use before deciding where to buy.

"sustainable fashion brands UK"
✓ Appears
"affordable UK clothing brands"
✗ Not cited
"best online clothing stores"
✗ Not cited

02 Top gaps costing OPA AI visibility

1
Missing category-specific FAQ schema
Buyers searching for specific product attributes get directed to competitors with structured content.
2
No comparison or buying guide content
High-intent comparison queries route buyers to review sites instead of your brand page.
3
Sparse AggregateRating markup
Customer reviews exist but aren't schema-marked — AI platforms can't extract or cite them.
🔒
Claim this audit to unlock all gaps + action plan
Claim the full audit →

03 OPA vs Category Leader

OPA · This brand
OPA
60
Rank #2 in apparel
Category leader · apparel
Lululemon UK
72
Rank #1 in apparel
Lululemon UK is scoring 12 points higher than OPA. The full audit shows exactly which AI queries Lululemon UK is winning that OPA isn't.
Is this your brand?

Claim the full OPA audit →

Enter your email below and we'll send the complete breakdown — every AI query, every gap, and a prioritised action plan. Free.

Free · No agency pitch · Results in under 60 seconds

Beat OPA's score — audit your own brand →

Not OPA? Run a free AI visibility audit on your apparel store and see how you compare.

Audit my brand free
Compare OPA against
Gymshark (Apparel) vs OPA Alphalete vs OPA Lululemon UK vs OPA OPA vs Rydelle Capro vs OPA
OPA scores 60/100. Is this your brand? Claim the full report free. Claim this audit →