food Ranked #2 of 8 in food
ShelfIQ AI Visibility Audit

Pip & Nut's AI Visibility Score: 61/100

Audited 21 May 2026 pipandnut.com
61
ShelfIQ Score
Visible but missing key queries
Tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Claude · food category
Share Post on X LinkedIn

01 Where Pip & Nut appears (and disappears) in AI search

Live buyer prompts tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. These are the queries your customers use before deciding where to buy.

"healthy snacks delivered UK"
✓ Appears
"organic food subscription boxes"
✗ Not cited
"best meal kit services UK"
✗ Not cited

02 Top gaps costing Pip & Nut AI visibility

1
Missing category-specific FAQ schema
Buyers searching for specific product attributes get directed to competitors with structured content.
2
No comparison or buying guide content
High-intent comparison queries route buyers to review sites instead of your brand page.
3
Sparse AggregateRating markup
Customer reviews exist but aren't schema-marked — AI platforms can't extract or cite them.
🔒
Claim this audit to unlock all gaps + action plan
Claim the full audit →

03 Pip & Nut vs Category Leader

Pip & Nut · This brand
Pip & Nut
61
Rank #2 in food
Category leader · food
Granola
67
Rank #1 in food
Granola is scoring 6 points higher than Pip & Nut. The full audit shows exactly which AI queries Granola is winning that Pip & Nut isn't.
Is this your brand?

Claim the full Pip & Nut audit →

Enter your email below and we'll send the complete breakdown — every AI query, every gap, and a prioritised action plan. Free.

Free · No agency pitch · Results in under 60 seconds

Beat Pip & Nut's score — audit your own brand →

Not Pip & Nut? Run a free AI visibility audit on your food store and see how you compare.

Audit my brand free
Compare Pip & Nut against
Notpla vs Pip & Nut Granola vs Pip & Nut Pip & Nut vs Roots Pip & Nut vs ZenBisco Kind vs Pip & Nut
Pip & Nut scores 61/100. Is this your brand? Claim the full report free. Claim this audit →