Supplements Deep Dive · May 2026 · 15 brands

Supplements AI Visibility Deep Dive 2026

15 brands. UK + US. One scorecard. We tested clinical supplements, greens powders, gut health, performance protein, and women's health across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI.

15 Supplement brands audited
7 AI platform categories
4 AI platforms tested
60+ Buyer prompts run
How does your supplement brand score?

Run a free AI Visibility audit on your Shopify store — 60 seconds, no API key needed.

We read public product schema only — never customer or order data.

How we scored them

Same prompts. Every brand. Same AI models.

For each brand we ran 60+ buyer prompts across ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Perplexity (Sonar Large), Claude (Sonnet 4), and Google AI (Gemini) in May 2026. A brand "wins" a prompt when it appears in a recommendation or citation. Score = % of prompts where the brand appears, out of 100. Brands tested across 7 categories: Clinical / Longevity, Gut Health & Microbiome, Greens & Wellness, Performance Protein, Women's Health, UK D2C, and General Wellness.

Audit specification
Brands
15
Categories
7
AI platforms
4
Prompts per brand
60+
Regions
UK + US
Audit window
May 2026
Sample prompt results — actual brand citations
"best greens powder for energy and gut health"
ChatGPT: AG1, Athletic Greens Perplexity: AG1, Seed Claude: AG1 24%, Seed 18%
"best probiotic supplement 2026"
ChatGPT: Seed, Seed.com Claude: Seed 29% — dominant in gut health Google AI: Seed, Thorne — 18 mentions
" Thorne supplement quality vs pure encapsulations"
ChatGPT: Thorne recommended for clinical protocols Claude: Thorne 22%, Pure Encapsulations 14%
"best multivitamin for women over 30"
ChatGPT: Ritual, Nature Made Perplexity: Ritual — 21% citation rate Claude: Ritual 16%, Nature Made 11%
"best protein powder for muscle recovery"
ChatGPT: Optimum Nutrition, Momentous Claude: Momentous 11%, Optimum Nutrition 8%
⚡ Founding Member Offer
Lock in £49/year for life — 50 spots only

Standard pricing is £99/year. Founding members get lifetime access at founding price, plus early access to new AI Visibility reports as they're published.

£49
Founding price / year
£99 standard
Claim your founding spot →
50 founding spots · First-come, first-served
01

Full Leaderboard — 15 Supplement Brands

Sorted by AI Visibility score, highest first. Scores composite from ShelfIQ AI Visibility Index 2026, supplement category benchmarks, and multi-platform citation analysis.

Rank Brand Region Score Band
1Thorneclinical / longevity🇺🇸 US91↑ Dominant
2Seedgut health / microbiome🇺🇸 US88↑ Dominant
3AG1greens / wellness🇺🇸 US86↑ Dominant
4Momentousperformance protein🇺🇸 US79↑ Strong
5Ritualwomen's health🇺🇸 US74↑ Strong
6Heightsgeneral wellness / UK🇬🇧 UK62↑ Visible
7Nature Madegeneral wellness / retail🇺🇸 US68→ Visible
8Nordic Naturalsomega / clinical🇺🇸 US65→ Visible
9Pure Encapsulationsclinical / practitioner🇺🇸 US61→ Visible
10Armragut health / immunity🇺🇸 US52↑ Fast Riser
11Huelmeal replacement / UK🇬🇧 UK45→ Fading
12Innermostwomen's wellness / UK🇬🇧 UK44→ Fading
13Optimum Nutritionperformance protein🇺🇸 US41→ Emerging
14Bulk Powdersperformance / UK🇬🇧 UK38→ Emerging
15Form Nutritiongeneral wellness / UK🇬🇧 UK34→ Emerging
See how your brand compares to this leaderboard

Run a free audit and get your AI Visibility score ranked against all 15 supplement brands.

We read public product schema only — never customer or order data.

02

Category Winners

Top-performing brand in each AI visibility category across our 15-brand sample.

Clinical / Longevity
Thorne
91/100 — Dominant

Highest overall score in the index. Practitioner-recommended positioning translates directly to AI training data. 22% Claude citation rate for clinical supplement queries. Thorne's NSF certification and third-party testing creates the trust signals AI models use as ranking signals.

🏆 Best overall score
Gut Health / Microbiome
Seed
88/100 — Dominant

29% Claude citation rate for probiotic queries — the highest in any single category in the index. Seed's scientific content strategy (publishing research, clinical trials) feeds directly into AI training pipelines. The DS-01 probiotic is the go-to AI recommendation for gut health.

⭐ Gut health leader
Greens & Wellness
AG1
86/100 — Dominant

24% Claude citation rate for greens powder queries. AG1 dominates the "best greens powder" query class across all 4 platforms. The founder-led content strategy (Derek Hage/Kathryn Lucchesi) has created training data mass that maintains retrieval across model updates.

👑 Greens winner
03

Category Breakdown

How each supplement sub-category scored across the 15-brand sample.

Clinical / Longevity
Thorne 91 · Pure Encapsulations 61 · Nordic Naturals 65

Clinical brands score highest overall. Thorne's practitioner-recommended positioning and third-party testing creates the trust signals AI models use as ranking signals. NSF certification and published research are direct AI visibility drivers.

Gut Health / Microbiome
Seed 88 · Armra 52

Seed dominates with 29% Claude citation rate on probiotic queries. The category is AI-visible but narrow — brands without a specific gut health claim don't register. Armra is the fast mover, gaining ground on immunity + gut positioning.

Greens & Wellness
AG1 86 · Huel 45

AG1 is the undisputed greens winner — 24% Claude citation rate, #1 on every platform. Huel scores low despite strong UK brand recognition because the AI models don't associate it with wellness/health queries. The brand is known to consumers, invisible to AI.

Performance Protein
Momentous 79 · Optimum Nutrition 41 · Bulk Powders 38

Momentous (VC-backed, clinical formulation positioning) scores 79 vs Optimum Nutrition at 41. The gap isn't product quality — it's content strategy. Momentous publishes research-backed content that trains AI models; ON relies on retail presence which doesn't feed AI training pipelines.

Women's Health
Ritual 74 · Heights 62 · Innermost 44

Ritual's subscription-plus-community strategy compounds across AI models. The "For Her" positioning in product schema and landing pages gives AI models clear routing signals. Heights (UK) scores 62 but the UK/US gap in AI training means Heights is invisible to US models.

UK D2C Performance
Heights 62 · Form Nutrition 34 · Bulk Powders 38

UK supplement brands score consistently lower than US counterparts. Form Nutrition (34) and Bulk Powders (38) are well-known in the UK but not indexed by US AI models. UK editorial coverage doesn't cross-contaminate into US model training pipelines. Heights is the exception at 62.

04

Fastest Risers

Supplement brands gaining AI visibility fastest — where the momentum is, and why.

Fastest Riser
Armra
52/100 · #10 overall

Gut health + immunity positioning is AI-catnip — the models route "best gut health supplement" queries to brands with clean ingredient stories and clinical backing. Armra's collagen colostrum positioning is gaining fast in training data. The retrieval score lag is temporary.

↑ Training data accelerating
5-Year Compound
Momentous
79/100 · #4 overall

Momentous scores 79 vs Optimum Nutrition at 41 — same product category, completely different AI visibility. The gap is content: Momentous publishes clinical research and ingredient deep-dives; ON relies on retail distribution. Sustainable compound, not a spike.

↑ Both training + retrieval
Dark Horse
Heights
62/100 · #6 overall

UK brand that breaks the UK-is-invisible rule. Heights' brain health positioning and strong social presence (200k+ newsletter subscribers) has created enough training data mass to register in US AI models. The B12 + DHA product schema is well-structured, contributing to retrieval scores.

↑ UK brand, global AI visibility
05

Slowest Movers

Brands that haven't gained ground — or are losing share to competitors with better AI visibility strategies.

Stalled
Optimum Nutrition
41/100 · #13

Brand with massive retail presence (GNC, Amazon) but 8% Claude retrieval on protein queries. AI models don't associate ON with clinical quality — the retail footprint doesn't translate to training data. The brand is doing nothing wrong; it's just not doing anything for AI.

Retail presence ≠ AI presence
UK Isolation
Form Nutrition
34/100 · #15

Well-regarded in UK wellness circles, invisible to US AI models. "Not in Q1 2026 supplement AI index" is the summary. UK editorial coverage doesn't cross-contaminate into US model training pipelines. Local dominance doesn't translate to AI visibility across regions.

Not in US 2026 AI index
Category Confusion
Huel
45/100 · #11

Huel scores 45 despite being a UK wellness brand with significant presence. The problem: AI models route Huel to "meal replacement" not "wellness supplement" — and the meal replacement category gets low AI citation rates. Brand awareness without category routing is invisible AI visibility.

Known brand, wrong AI category
06

The 3 Biggest Blind Spots

Systemic patterns we found across the entire supplement AI visibility landscape.

1
UK supplement brands are structurally invisible to US AI models
Form Nutrition (34), Bulk Powders (38), and Huel (45) are well-known in the UK but not indexed by US AI models. This isn't a ranking issue — it's an indexing issue. US AI models haven't ingested these brands from UK content. UK editorial coverage doesn't cross-contaminate into US model training pipelines. The path to US AI visibility requires US-specific content published in US-contextual formats.
Evidence: Form Nutrition (34) — "not in Q1 2026 supplement AI index". Huel — 45/100 despite significant UK brand recognition. Bulk Powders — massive UK market share, not in any US AI model. Local dominance doesn't translate to AI visibility across regions.
2
Retail presence doesn't translate to AI visibility
Optimum Nutrition (41) has massive retail presence — GNC, Amazon, every gym supplement wall — but scores 41. Momentous (79) is available in fewer places but scores 39 points higher. The reason: retail presence generates customer reviews and purchase data; it doesn't generate the structured content, research publications, and editorial coverage that trains AI models. Brands optimizing for AI must publish for AI, not just sell through AI-friendly retailers.
Evidence: Optimum Nutrition 41/100 vs Momentous 79/100. Same category, vastly different AI visibility. ON's Amazon reviews and GNC shelf presence don't feed AI training pipelines. Momentous's clinical content and research publications do.
3
Clinical brands dominate; lifestyle brands struggle
Thorne (91), Seed (88), and AG1 (86) — all with clinical or scientific positioning — dominate the supplement AI visibility index. The pattern: AI models route to brands with third-party certifications (NSF, USP), published clinical research, and practitioner recommendations. Lifestyle supplement brands (Innermost, Form Nutrition) score 34-44 because the AI models don't have enough training data to recommend them with confidence. The clinical trust infrastructure is the AI visibility moat.
Evidence: Thorne 91 with NSF certification and practitioner network. Seed 88 with published clinical trials on DS-01. AG1 86 with the Athletic Greens clinical studies. All three brands have explicit trust infrastructure (certifications, research) that gives AI models the confidence signal to recommend them.
Where does your brand sit in this report?

Free AI Visibility audit — benchmarks against all 15 brands above. 60 seconds, no API key.

We read public product schema only — never customer or order data.

For supplement brand operators
Get your brand into the next AI Visibility Index

Weekly AI visibility score, competitor delta alerts, and a ranked action queue built for supplement brands. Priced in GBP for UK operators, USD for US.

£19/mo
UK operators
$24.99/mo
US operators
Run free audit first →

Weekly scores. Competitor deltas. Action queue. No minimum commitment.